Thursday, 26 April 2012
Sustainability Pathways
On the new sustainability website of FAO I came across this photo: for me it symbolizes resilience as a core value of sustainability. The website also features a new definition. New for me at least: Sustainability means ensuring human rights and well-being without depleting or diminishing the capacity of the earth's ecosystems to support life, or at the expense of others well-being. It is a multi-dimensional concept encompassing environmental integrity, social well-being, economic resilience and good governance: each of these sustainability dimensions involves several issues and all dimensions need to be considered. Sustainability is an ambitious objective that can be reached through different pathways.
Wednesday, 25 April 2012
Unilever's 5 Levers for Change
Consumer behaviour change is one of todays topics in the Sustainable Living Lab. Next to the video there is a publication you can downlad.
Friday, 30 March 2012
Protected area communication
Communication can be a waste of money. I saw this poster of African Parks on Schiphol airport. The pictures of species attract attention, thats good. The text is in Dutch and asks for support, but the telephone number is in South Africa - no country code. And the web address is difficult to remember when you go down the escalator. In other words: what is the point?
Thursday, 29 March 2012
War on science
Research on climate change or on endangered species or on the safety of certain energy strategies is seen as bolstering an argument for regulation – so science is associated with imposing rules on businesses. This is one of the conclusions of a study by Gordon Gauchat: just over 34 percent of conservatives had confidence in science as an institution in 2010, representing a long-term decline from 48 percent in 1974, according to his paper being published today in American Sociological Review. This is not a good sign for those of us who like evidence-based decision making. And it is a an extra challenge for communicators.
Monday, 26 March 2012
To be able to communicate strategically behaviour of target groups should be described in very concrete and simple actions they take or can take.
It is not helpful to describe the impact of current or desired behaviour, e.g. economic development in important breeding grounds. Current behaviour of decision makers has to be described in terms of agenda and priority setting, public statements, formulation of tasks for civil servants etc. The communication objectives are focused on those changes. Communication objectives are not the same as management objectives.
Friday, 16 March 2012
The universe in a single atom
A compelling narrative about how we all are part of nature and nature is part of us. On his blog Applicable Knowledge on One Slide, Digital Marketing Explorer George Strakhov shares insights he gained in his work. I had missed the one on attitude to nature. The quote from physicist Richard Feynman comes from Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! (Adventures of a Curious Character). It is a good addition to other posts on branding biodiversity. It even could be the basis for a powerful short movie to be used to implement worldwide target 1 of the CBD strategic plan.
Tuesday, 13 March 2012
Monday, 12 March 2012
Communication strategy
One of the goals of the public awareness campaign Mother Sundarbans is to reduce the number of killings of stray tigers. The strategy has segmented the audiences. Young villagers are an important target audience. Based on my limited knowledge of the situation, I make the following assumptions about current and desired behavior behaviour and attitudes and dream up the first elements of a subcampaign directed towards young men: "Become a fan, friend or member of a local tiger team." Now the challenge is to be also more concrete about the other campaign goals (deer meat poaching and consumption) and other audiences audiences (women, youth, etc.).
Saturday, 10 March 2012
Dreaming biodiversity
Duke John and duchess Jacoba during a fishing party closeby their castle in The Hague. From my perspective it looks like Jan van Eyck tries to raise our awareness of biodiversity. "We all are part of nature: the air we breath, the water we drink, the fish and fruits we eat. Our diet depends mainly on the plants and animals around us. Same for our buildings and clothes. Trade provides variety, but trade is helped by horses, wind and sea. And against the dangers of the sea, we have the forested dunes around us."
Had van Eyck known the concepts of bacteria, chemicals, cells and atoms, he would have alluded to this level in which our body is connected to the wider natural system of the world. I dream that the message of this drawing is: “You may take biodiversity for granted, and it is so obviously all around you, that it is easy to forget it’s there - that you are a part of it and can’t live apart from it.“
Friday, 9 March 2012
Frappez toujours
A message has to be repeated often enough to have the desired effect. "Jan van Eyck back in The Hague", was the small advertizement in the newspaper this morning. A few weeks ago I had read an article about the exposition. My interest was raised, but somehow I forgot all about it. This morning I saw this weekend would be the last opportunity. So I combined a visit to the museum with an appointment I had in The Hague. Grateful to the museum and the principle of `frappez toujours`, I thoroughly enjoyed the famous drawing with the ´Ridderzaal´ in the background. Below is a photo of the present situation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










