![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0jrXXyG_zAB3cHXDM1e3lgCBWVtTjMmtzoMaz09tUClUutv1hNMDkXKrtCLSmLN7X3pRxN2SRXlhgK6_eb45irDweAUq_3SXsYrc5jZv0pR_4BYKDEiydyw3EinaRwaW-9baT_oprYV-v/s200/mountain+top+2.jpg)
My answer to the question refers to an experience as a consultant with Natura 2000. A Ministry of Environment had no infrastructure to communicate the new policy to local stakeholders of the more than 100 sites in the country. Establishing relationships at various levels with the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry made it possible to use their extension services. The advantage was that these extensionists already knew the land owners and users. Of course it took time, negotiations, trade offs (e.g. help to establish criteria for sustainable agriculture subsidies) and training. But it worked very well. In Section 3 of the CEPA toolkit more examples are given how to mainstream biodiversity. For the article I wrote for the conference, click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment